The Influencer Series is an intimate, invite-only gathering of influential, good-energy leaders. The intent is to have fun, high-impact, “dinner table” conversations with people you don't know but should. The Influencer Series has connected over 4,000 participants and 15,000 influencers in our community over the last decade.
These roundtable conversations provide a space for prominent VC funds, corporate leaders, start-up founders, academics, and other influencers to explore new ideas through an authentic and connective experience.
A recent MIT study revealed a sobering reality: 95% of enterprise AI initiatives fail. This statistic represents both a warning and an opportunity for founders who understand the underlying causes.
Amr Awadallah, co-founder and former CTO of Cloudera—the big data company acquired for $5.3 billion—is tackling this challenge with their new venture Vittara. Their experience navigating complex enterprise technology landscapes offers valuable insights for AI entrepreneurs.
This article explores Awadallah's framework for building sustainable AI companies, from identifying genuine market opportunities, to assembling the right team, and selecting strategic investors whose contributions extend beyond financial investment.
Enterprise AI fails due to lack of production expertise, experimental budgets without business alignment, and mismatched expectations about AI capabilities.
Authentic passion for solving specific problems provides the resilience necessary to overcome challenges in building an AI company.
The first 50 employees disproportionately shape company culture, making swift hiring decisions a cornerstone of early-stage success.
Genuine AI opportunities require validating business pain points through the "three whys" framework and securing production budgets.
Strong co-founder relationships with complementary skills and shared vision prevent the founder conflicts causing 70% of startup failures.
The MIT report's 95% failure rate might sound like clickbait, but the research behind it reveals something more nuanced than simple technological shortcomings. The study surveyed numerous enterprises deploying AI technologies and identified patterns that separate successful implementations from the majority that never make it to sustainable production.
What's particularly telling is how many AI initiatives begin life not as solutions to identified business problems, but as responses to board pressure. "Go do AI" isn't a strategy—it's a mandate that leads to experimental budgets, proof-of-concepts, and ultimately get abandoned. Without a clear articulation of what success looks like from a business perspective, these projects were doomed before the first line of code was written.
The expectations gap compounds this problem. Major technology companies have, in their enthusiasm to promote AI adoption, oversold what the technology can currently deliver. The result? A mismatch between what organizations expect AI to accomplish and what even the most sophisticated systems can reliably achieve today.
Success in enterprise AI requires something more fundamental than technical prowess—it demands strategic alignment between AI capabilities, genuine business objectives, and outcomes that can be measured and validated.
Experimental budgets represent one of the most insidious failure patterns in enterprise AI. These innovation funds allow teams to build impressive prototypes that generate excitement during demos, but they lack the organizational commitment necessary for production deployment. A startup might reach $20 million in revenue serving these experimental budgets, only to watch it evaporate when the experiments conclude.
The technical complexity of production AI systems presents challenges that most organizations dramatically underestimate. Building a prototype that works in a controlled environment differs fundamentally from deploying a system that handles real-world data, edge cases, and the messy reality of enterprise operations. Many companies discover this gap only after committing significant resources to implementations that can't make the leap from demo to production.
Perhaps the most significant obstacle is the shortage of engineers who genuinely understand how to run AI systems at scale. YouTube tutorials, blog posts, and false confidence create a false confidence that building production AI systems is straightforward. Teams dive in thinking they can handle it internally, only to confront challenges around context management, security, and accuracy that they're unprepared to solve.
When business users finally interact with these home-grown AI systems, the results are often disastrous. Reports filled with hallucinated information or containing confidential data that should never have been accessible erode trust immediately. Without proper context management—the sophisticated engineering required to feed AI systems the right information with appropriate metadata, access controls, and governance—these failures become inevitable rather than exceptional.
The "three whys" framework provides founders with a reality check against the AI hype cycle. Why do anything in the first place? Why now? And why should a customer work with you specifically? These questions force a level of specificity that reveals whether an opportunity is genuine or illusory.
But here's the thing: the existence of a budget doesn't validate a market. Many organizations have created AI budget line items in response to board pressure, but these often represent experimental funds rather than production commitments. Awadallah warns that these fake budgets can fuel rapid early growth that disappears just as quickly, leaving startups with inflated valuations and no sustainable revenue base.
The key distinction lies in finding business owners—not just technology leaders—who can articulate specific pain points. A CTO excited about AI represents a very different opportunity than a VP of Operations who can explain exactly how AI might solve a concrete efficiency problem costing the company measurable money. The former might have an experimental budget; the latter likely has a production budget with staying power.
Not every application of AI is ready for prime time. Document generation, conversational AI, question answering, and customer support have demonstrated reliable enough performance that they represent genuine opportunities today. Founders pursuing applications outside these proven areas need exceptional evidence that the technology is ready for production deployment, not just impressive demos.
Awadallah's philosophy on founder passion is deceptively simple: you need to love the problem you're solving, not the technology you're using to solve it. This distinction matters enormously in the AI space, where the technology itself generates so much excitement that founders can lose sight of whether they're addressing problems they genuinely care about.
His personal experience provides a clear litmus test. With his first startup—a comparison shopping engine that sold to Yahoo after nine months—Awadallah realized he wasn't excited to go to work anymore. That recognition led him to sell the company despite its early success. The contrast with Cloudera and now Vittara is stark: he never questioned his passion for solving the big data problem or the enterprise AI deployment challenge.
This isn't about forcing yourself to be enthusiastic during difficult periods. Genuine passion manifests as something more fundamental—you can't stop thinking about the problem, your neurons fire when you discuss it, and you wake up eager to make progress. Love for a problem, like love for a person, isn't something you can fake for long.
The connection between passion and resilience isn't coincidental. Stanford research has identified grit—the combination of perseverance and passion—as the strongest predictor of entrepreneurial success. But perseverance without passion is unsustainable. You'll give up when the inevitable setbacks arrive, and in AI development, those setbacks are guaranteed.
Strong co-founder relationships share a characteristic that might seem counterintuitive: the ability to argue intensely while never becoming upset with each other. Awadallah describes his relationship with Mike Olson at Cloudera as one where they could have vigorous debates, even point out mistakes directly, yet remain unified in their commitment to the mission.
This kind of radical candor requires something deeper than professional respect—it demands alignment on vision and purpose. When co-founders share genuine passion for the problem they're solving, disagreements become about finding the best path forward rather than defending personal positions. The moment you feel the need to conceal something from a co-founder represents a fundamental breakdown in the relationship.
Around 70% of startup failures stem from founder conflicts, making the co-founder relationship one of the highest-leverage decisions in company building. Yet many founders rush into partnerships without establishing clear frameworks for resolving disagreements. Whether it's the CEO making final calls on business decisions, the CTO on technical matters, or having rules of engagement prevents conflicts from becoming existential threats.
The complementary nature of co-founder skills matters as much as shared passion. Awadallah and Olson brought different strengths to Cloudera, and those differences became sources of strength rather than friction because they operated from a foundation of mutual respect, and unified purpose.
Your first 50 employees will define everything that follows. They establish company culture—which is significant—while at that scale, a single person also represents 2% of the company's total throughput. One underperforming or culturally misaligned employee doesn't just reduce productivity by 2%; they typically affect at least ten people around them, creating a drag of 10–20% on the entire organization.
Awadallah learned this lesson the hard way at Cloudera. The founding team was initially too accommodating with early hires who weren't working out, investing in coaching, and second chances. But in the first five years of a company, when you're racing against well-funded competitors, you simply don't have time for that approach. The lesson they're applying at Vittara is ruthlessly simple: give underperforming early employees a warning at one month, another at two months, and if things haven't improved by month three, help them transition out.
Network-based hiring provides the best hedge against early hiring mistakes. When you bring on people you've worked with before, you know their work ethic, their expertise, and their cultural fit. If you can fill your first ten positions with known quantities, those ten will have their own networks to help you reach 50. The unknown quantities you do hire require close monitoring during their first three months, with swift corrections if the fit isn't right.
This might sound brutal, but it's actually more humane than the alternative. Allowing someone to stay in a role where they're not succeeding damages both the company and the individual. Making swift, clean transitions with fair severance and support allows everyone to move forward rather than lingering in an unproductive situation.
Not all capital is created equal. Awadallah divides investors into two categories: those who come from operating backgrounds and those who approach investing as a purely financial exercise. The difference in support and value-add between these two types can determine whether a startup survives its darkest moments.
At Vittara, one of Awadallah's key investors is Alfred Lin from Sequoia Capital. Before becoming an investor, Lin was CEO and founder of LinkExchange, one of the most successful enterprise software companies of its era. They understand viscerally the struggles that founders face building from ground zero. The result is accessibility—Awadallah can send a message on Signal, WhatsApp, or email and get immediate support when they need guidance.
Contrast that with some of Cloudera's investors who operated more like private equity financial operators. Their focus remained fixed on metrics and returns rather than providing support through challenging periods. When Awadallah needed advice or someone to talk through difficult decisions, that support wasn't available. As a founder, you've got to project confidence to your team—which means you need investors who can serve as confidants when you're wrestling with uncertainty.
This distinction matters most in early funding rounds—seed, Series A, and Series B. Once you've achieved product-market fit and are scaling, financial investors can play valuable roles. But in those formative stages when you're still figuring things out, having investors who've walked the founder path themselves makes an enormous difference.
Explore Alchemist Accelerator's approach to funding enterprise AI founders at alchemistaccelerator.com, where we connect startups with investors who understand the unique challenges of AI ventures.
Vittara directly addresses the production deployment challenges that drive the 95% failure rate. The platform functions as an operating system for enterprise AI, providing the infrastructure that organizations need to deploy agents safely and effectively at scale
The problem Vittara solves becomes clear through a historical analogy. Before Oracle, companies built databases by assembling components piecemeal—storage from one vendor, indexing from another, query planning from a third—then spending months integrating everything. When they finally completed the integration, the technology had already evolved, leaving them with legacy systems. Worse, different developers built different systems for different use cases, creating maintenance nightmares when those developers left.
Larry Ellison's genius was recognizing that CTOs and CIOs needed a unified platform with a consistent API for developers and a centralized management layer for administrators. That's where the DBA role was born—someone who could manage all database deployments from a security, cost, performance, and quality perspective.
The same pattern is repeating with AI. Organizations are building agent systems by stitching together various components, creating sprawl that becomes impossible to manage effectively. Each implementation handles context differently, leading to inconsistent security, wildly varying costs, and unpredictable accuracy. The solution requires the same architectural approach that worked for databases: a unified platform with consistent APIs and centralized management.
Vittara's platform provides that unified layer. Developers get a consistent API for building AI applications, while a new role—the Agent Administrator—can manage all AI deployments across security, cost, performance, and accuracy dimensions. This shift from piecemeal implementation to systematic deployment represents the difference between experimental AI projects and production-grade systems that organizations can actually scale.
After building two multi-billion dollar companies and working at the highest levels of Google, Yahoo, and Awadallah distills their advice into six words: "Make sure you love it." This deceptively simple guidance comes from decades of experience witnessing both successful ventures and failed attempts in the technology space. Their emphasis on genuine passion stems from seeing too many founders chase trends rather than problems they truly care about solving.
Those words capture everything that precedes them—the importance of authentic passion for problems rather than fascination with technology, the resilience that comes from genuine commitment, and the ability to weather inevitable setbacks. It's advice that sounds simple until you recognize how rare it is for founders to truly follow it. The difference between superficial interest and deep commitment becomes most apparent precisely when challenges arise.
The 95% failure rate in enterprise AI represents both a challenge and an opportunity. For founders who understand the real reasons behind those failures—lack of production expertise, experimental budgets, mismatched expectations, and inadequate context management—the path to differentiation becomes clear. Combined with authentic passion, strong co-founder relationships, strategic early hiring, and supportive investors, the lessons from Silicon Valley legends like Awadallah provide a roadmap for joining the successful 5%.
Microsoft for Startups Founders Hub helps startups radically accelerate innovation by providing access to industry-leading AI services, expert guidance, and the essential technology needed to build a future-proofed startup.
Alchemist Accelerator is a global venture-backed accelerator focused on accelerating seed-stage ventures that monetize from enterprises (not consumers). The accelerator invests in enterprise companies with distinctive technical founders and provides founders a structured path to traction, fundraising, mentorship, and community during the 6-month program.
Orrick is a global law firm focused on serving the Technology & Innovation, Energy & Infrastructure, Finance and Life Sciences & HealthTech sectors. Leading companies and new entrants call on our teams in 25+ markets worldwide for forward-looking, pragmatic advice on transactions, litigation, and compliance matters.
At Juniper Networks, we believe the network is the single greatest vehicle for knowledge, understanding, and human advancement that the world has ever known. Now more than ever, the world needs network innovation to connect ideas and unleash our full potential. Juniper is taking a new approach to the network — one that is intelligent, agile, secure and open to any vendor and any network environment.
FinStrat Management is a premier outsourced financial operations firm specializing in accounting, finance, and reporting solutions for early-stage and investor-backed companies, family offices, high-net-worth individuals, and venture funds.
The firm’s core offerings include fractional CFO-led accounting + finance services, fund accounting and administration, and portfolio company monitoring + reporting. Through hands-on financial leadership, FinStrat helps clients with strategic forecasting, board reporting, investor communications, capital markets planning, and performance dashboards. The company's fund services provide end-to-end back-office support for venture capital firms, including accounting, investor reporting, and equity management.
In addition to financial operations, FinStrat deploys capital on behalf of investors through a model it calls venture assistance, targeting high-growth companies where FinStrat also serves as an end-to-end outsourced business process strategic partner. Clients benefit from improved financial insight, streamlined operations, and enhanced stakeholder confidence — all at a fraction of the cost of building an in-house team.
FinStrat also produces The Innovators & Investors Podcast, a platform that showcases conversations with leading founders, VCs, and ecosystem builders. The podcast is designed to surface real-world insights from early-stage operators and investors, with the goal of demystifying what drives successful startups and funds. By amplifying these voices, FSM supports the broader early-stage ecosystem, encouraging knowledge-sharing, connectivity, and more efficient founder-investor alignment.
Alchemist connects a global network of enterprise founders, investors, corporations, and mentors to the Silicon Valley community.
Alchemist Accelerator is a global venture-backed accelerator focused on accelerating seed-stage ventures that monetize from enterprises (not consumers). The accelerator invests in enterprise companies with distinctive technical founders and provides founders a structured path to traction, fundraising, mentorship, and community during the 6-month program.
AlchemistX partners with forward-thinking corporations and governments to deliver innovation programs worldwide. These specialized programs leverage the expertise and tools that have fueled Alchemist startups’ success since 2012. Our mission is to transform innovation challenges into opportunities.
Join our community of founders, mentors, and investors.